FULL TEXT Search

But, headline first in the NCDC and GISS estimates. should read “one of the two warmest” [Richard Soulen (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 248-39)] rather than “one of the warmest two” 3-119 A 3:16 3:16 Perhaps 'warmer' is better than 'ahead'.

[Richard B. Alley (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 4-10)] 6-6 A 0:0 Overall, this Chapter is well-written and comprehensive. The posing of specific questions Noted, revised as needed at the start of each section is appreciated.

Batch From To Comment Notes melting of the ice on land, and thus apparently exclude the melting of icebergs and by inference discharge from Antarctica and large areas of Greenland. [Richard Hindmarsh (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 106-6)] 4-265 A 24:40 24:40 Consistent with what? Accepted—text modified. [Chris Folland (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 71-122)] 4-266 A 24:42 Note that, once ice is afloat, it already contributed to the sea level.

But their variations greatly differ from year to year. (ref. Rorsch A, Thoenes D and Courtney RS, (E&E v10 no2 (2005)). Indeed, on Page 2-11 Chapter 2 Section 2.2 Line 14 the draft Chapter admits that the airborne fraction of CO2 varies between 30% to 80% on 2 year time scales. 2.

Text corrected [William Kininmonth (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 128-7)] TS-114 A 6:3 6:3 I think carbon monoxide is not removed by washout Text has been clarified [Yukitomo TSUTSUMI (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 270-2)] TS-115 A 6:4 Replace "through" with "by" Agreed [Richard Soulen (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 248-24)] TS-116 A 6:6 Remove semicolon and change "due to" to "caused by" Agreed but no semicolon to remove [Richard Soulen (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 248-25)] TS-117 A 6:9 6:50 In this section it would be useful to compare the different radiative forcings using %'s or It is problematic to compare individual fractions - eg the radiative forcing due to methane is currently ~1/3 that of CO2, and the terms to the total RF including aerosol forcing of nitrous oxide is about 1/3 that of methane.

Siegmund, Chris D. Thorncroft, Peter W. Thorne, 18 Sakari M. Uppala, Russell S. Vose, Bin Wang, Stephen G. Warren, Richard Washington, Matthew C. 19 Wheeler, Bruce A. Wielicki, Takmeng Wong, David B.Wuertz. 20 21 Review Editors: Brian J.

The reverse is true at the surface with only a limited number of high quality point measurements but providing an excellent temporal coverage." [Richard Allan (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 3-43)] 3-610 A 37:0 Section 3.4.4 Radiation. This section fails to mention the many high quality satellite-Accept, Text modified as suggested..

This could be used to support a number of statements made in the text - I provide some specific suggestions for this below. [Richard Betts (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 21-2)] 11-10 A 0:0 Chapter 11 is clear and comprehensive.

Osborn, T. Pavlova, V. Petoukhov, T. Phillips 17 (PCMDI), S. Power, S. Rahmstorf, S. Raper, H. Renssen, D. Rind, M. Roberts, A. Rosati (GFDL), C. Schär 18 (ETH), J. Scinnoca, A. Schmittner (OSU), D.

[Govt. of India (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 2013-2)] TS-134 A 6:24 6:24 In saying "any similar period", how far back does this go?