Skip to search form

RESULTS: 161 - 170 of 3914

 

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert and Government Review Comments on the Second-Order Draft, Chapter 10. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 146. 146

increases as well as precipitation increases expected in glaciated regions have been incorporated (I believe they have been, but wording is unclear…) [Richard B. Alley (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 4-17)] 10-1052 A 57:57 57:57 Typo? Accepted. [ European Commission (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 2008-68)] 10-1053 A 57:57 57:57 Is it really 2550% (25x)?

 

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert Review Comments on First-Order Draft, Chapter 10. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 172. 172

lines are added there for convenience of display but are based on a different method (LGM). [Richard Wood] 10-1239 A 71:37 71:38 Add the following reference between lines 37 and 38: "Caires, S., V. R. Swail, and X. L. References have been revised and Wang, 2005: Projection and analysis of extreme wave climate.

 

Chapter 3. Observations: Surface and Atmosphetic Climate Change. page 3-1. 214

Siegmund, Chris D. Thorncroft, Peter W. Thorne, 18 Sakari M. Uppala, Russell S. Vose, Bin Wang, Stephen G. Warren, Richard Washington, Matthew C. 19 Wheeler, Bruce A. Wielicki, Takmeng Wong, David B. Wuertz. 20 21 Review Editors: Brian J.

 

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert and Government Review Comments on the Second-Order Draft, Chapter 5. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 35. 35

Agree that statement that "only remaining over the method) indirect estimates exist" is incorrect. [Richard Wood (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 294-9)] 5-260 A 13:11 13:11 "changes in " before "ocean circulation"? Accept. [Govt. of Australia (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 2001-279)] 5-261 A 13:17 13:17 upper km is there a number missing before "km"?

 

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert and Government Review Comments on the Second-Order Draft, Chapter 9. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 75. 75

See 9-721 [Govt. of United States of America (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 2023-616)] 9-723 A 41:20 Suggest adding the words "over 5 samples taken" after "30%" Accepted. [Richard Wood (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 294-15)] 9-724 A 41:30 41:30 Replace "anthropogenic" with "human-induced" Rejected.

 

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert and Government Review Comments on the Second-Order Draft, Chapter 1. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 60. 60

How about an iron? have warmed themselves from the IR [Richard Allan (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 3-16)] radiation from a fire. 1-458 A 38:39 38:39 Sentence should read: … a surface must have a temperature around … In addition to the Accepted.

 

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert and Government Review Comments on the Second-Order Draft, Chapter 8. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 63. 63

[Govt. of Canada (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 2004-179)] 8-566 A 43:38 43:38 in approach with -> with approach in Rejected. Would not improve the text. [Govt. of Finland (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 2009-93)] 8-567 A 43:39 43:39 we will -> we shall Rejected.