FULL TEXT Search

I'd assume it relates to the differences in heat capacity. [Richard Allan (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 3-60)] SPM- A 11:1 11:2 "The first sentence is too technical and not clear enough.

However, can I suggest some improvements in the following comments. [Richard Betts (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 21-10)] 11-992 A 53:46 53:46 Instead of "accelerate" say "contribute to acceleration of" - the carbon cycle feedbacks is Accepted.

These are removed from exec summary [Richard Soulen (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 248-37)] 3-107 A 3:7 Put a period after decade to the minus one and begin the next sentence This suggests . . ." accepted 821 3-821 38 [Richard Soulen (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 248-37)] 3-108 A 3:8 3:10 Why not estimate the linear warming over 1901-2005?

This paper should put to bed the earthshine issue. [Bruce Wielicki (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 287-6)] 3-620 A 38:35 times scales" --> "time-scales Accepted. [Richard Allan (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 3-47)] 3-621 A 38:40 38:44 Here or above, or cross referencing another chapter, is it possible to be say something Already cross-referenced on page 38.

Correction made. [Richard Allan] 8-798 A 58:13 on --> of? Accepted. Correction made. [Richard Allan] 8-799 A 58:17 58:17 lockstep? Accepted. "Lockstep" removed.

[Michael Vellinga] 10-637 A 23:9 23:9 Delete first “South of 60N” Accepted. [Richard Wood] 10-638 A 23:15 23:15 Maybe ref 8.4.6, where this is discussed in more detail. Rejected: Reference was in listr [Richard Wood] 10-639 A 23:19 23:21 Gregory et al 2005b ref was missing.

Stott, 2004: Does the recent freshening trend in the North Atlantic indicate a weakening thermohaline circulation? Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L02204 (status - published) [Richard Wood] 5-403 A 11:48 11:49 Suggested supplement for page 54 before [START OF BOX 5.1] by Walter Zenk noted: added to new discussion of S.

The helpfu. reason for the references given is that [Richard B. Alley (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 4-18)] they are climate change studies referred to in this section. 10-1077 A 58:51 58:52 I do not at all understand how a degree day system would work.

[Richard Allan (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 3-31)] 3-256 A 8:2 8:2 The order of references need to be started from the paper publiserd earlier, namely, here it Accepted.

[Jeffrey Kueter] 10-669 A 24:44 24:53 I think the argument here is misleading. It’s the total fresh water added to the North Noted. Atlantic from all sources that’s important, rather than the contribution from Greenland alone.