FULL TEXT Search

And of course, water vapor is also the source for cloud formation which can produce additional positive and negative feedbacks. [Andrew Lacis] 2-2337 A 94:7 94:12 Need to spell out the distinction between direct human generation of atmospheric water-Rejected A discussion of the vapour and the major indirect contribution.

Trying to link a regional temperature change to a global trend is a bit of a stretch - sure, there may well be some kind of relationship, but there is no established direct cause and effect, hence the implication is not appropriate. [Andrew Lacis] 7-319 A 6:43 6:44 Does this imply that deforestation (and not CO2) is the explanation of the observed Noted. No, it is clearly stated that warming?

Omit, or replace it with something better. Taken into account. All Chapter 1 [Andrew Lacis] FOD figures are changed or dropped. 1-796 A 44:1 Figure 1.2. Could this figure be updated for AR4 ? The actual figure is taken from TAR.

But computing radiative forcings as a direct GCM diagnostic is not straight forward and brings on a new set of problems. [Andrew Lacis] 2-1975 A 58:44 58:44 Suggest adding (Fa) after "standard RF definition" to help readers who may be reading Formula dropped this part of the chapter without having read the earlier parts.

Furthermore, even if ERBE could measure this flux change, it would be a measurement related to ocean heat capacity and the rate of heat transport into the ocean, not climate sensitivity. [Andrew Lacis] 9-1177 A 56:36 56:36 Possibly worth reminding the reader what sort of increases are thought plausible for the Reader has been referred to ch 10.

Ozone also has significant longitudinal variability for both stratospheric and tropospheric ozone, with the longitudinal distribution of tropospheric ozone being significanlty impacted by anthropogenic activity. [Andrew Lacis] 2-824 A 19:31 Section 2.3.7.1. I did not find in this section an explanation to the statement given in the Accepted. Section reworded executive summary saying that RF of stratospheric ozone is expected to decrease in the future if the ozone hole shows signs of recovery.

For particles larger than 2.2 microns, the volcanic aerosol greenhouse effects starts to dominate the solar albedo effect to produce surface warming instead of cooling. [Andrew Lacis] 2-1909 A 55:31 replace "2.3.6.1" by "2.3.7.1" (?) Accepted [Joanna Haigh] 2-1910 A 55:33 55:35 delete the paragraph Accepted Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote Chapter 2: Batch AB (11/16/05) Page 269 of 386

Balt 9750.153.125 Lacis, Vilis. Uz jauno krastu. Riga, 1965. Balt 9750.153.130 Lacis, Vilis. Sencu aicinajums. Riga, 1965. Balt 9750.153.140 Lacis, Vilis.

Barons. Sydney, 1958. Balt 9772.3.120 Lacis, Osvalds. Kivite. Minneaplis, 1968. Balt 9772.3.110 Lacis, Osvalds. Mes un vipas. Sydney, 1964. Balt 9750.153.120 Lacis, Vilis.

[Andrew Lacis] Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote Chapter 8: Batch AB (11/16/05) Page 117 of 150