RESULTS: 1 - 10 of 34
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert Review Comments on First-Order Draft, Chapter 6. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 186. 186
Text modified
[William Howard]
6-1490 A 33:42 33:43 As for the following description, "However, the relationship between sunspot numbers Noted.
and solar magnetic field is not fully understood," a report of Itoh will give a further
insight (K. Itoh, "A novel empirical relation between the aa index and sunspot numbers:
theoretical considerations and applications," Japan Geoscience Union Meeting 2001, En-
P001 (http://www-jm.eps.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/2001cd-rom/pdf/en/en-p001_e.pdf).
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert Review Comments on First-Order Draft, Chapter 2. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 14. 14
Suggestions along this line will show the direction of future
climate researches, and worth to note somewhere in the report.
[Kiminori Itoh]
2-54 A 0:0 The authors have worked hard to put together a well-balanced draft. I enjoyed reading it Thanks
from the first line to the end
[Fortunat Joos]
2-55 A 0:0 I was surprised to see the over-emphasis on Concept of RF (Radiative forcing) in Partially accepted.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert Review Comments on First-Order Draft, Chapter 5. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 151. 151
Will be changed
[John Church]
5-1203 A 86:5 I feel strange to see a future projection in Figure 1 because the chapter is discussing Sea level box is in collaboration with
observations. chapter 10
[Kiminori Itoh]
5-1204 A 86:7 Q 5.1, Fig. 1 Fix typo: Chpater -> Chapter. Ok
[Melinda Marquis]
Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote Chapter 5: Batch AB (11/16/05) 151 of 152
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert Review Comments on First-Order Draft, Chapter 6. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 187. 187
In this case, of course (and unfortunately), issue is given in Chapter 9
the model calculations shown in Figure 6.10 cannot be relied on.
[Kiminori Itoh]
6-1501 A 34:10 34:11 Also state Solanki results Noted.
[Stephen McIntyre]
6-1502 A 34:12 34:12 "the radiative forcing used in Chapter 9" : replace with "the magnitude of the radiative Accepted.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert Review Comments on First-Order Draft, Chapter 9. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 56. 56
Expert Review Comments on First-Order Draft (16 November 2005) IPCC Working Group I Fourth Assessment Report
Page:line
No. Batch From To Comment Notes
[Kiminori Itoh]
9-388 A 15:24 It is not clear how the peresented results were obtained. The description of the experinet These descriptieons are in the original
should be slightly extended to explain what forcing has been applied, what ozone changes papers.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert Review Comments on First-Order Draft, Chapter 9. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 141. 141
Akasofu points out, due to the
changes in the ocean currents, the mechanism suggested by conventional models (ice-
snow feedback) is neither plausible nor convincing.
[Kiminori Itoh]
9-1091 A 52:52 52:53 may
to some extent" too weak: "will
to some extent" or just "may Accepted
[William Ingram]
9-1092 A 52:53 Delete quantitative Reject.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert Review Comments on First-Order Draft, Chapter 11. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 4. 4
added (LAs and CLAs)
[Kiminori Itoh]
11-19 A 0:0 The chapter is written very nicely, taking into account most of the important achievments Noted, editorial action taken (CLAs).
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert Review Comments on First-Order Draft, Chapter 6. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 147. 147
A comment on this point is necessary. uncertainty discussion
[Kiminori Itoh]
6-1218 A 26:40 This undoutedbly will be the most contentious section in the Chapter - particulary in accepted
relation to 'hockey sticks'.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert Review Comments on First-Order Draft, Chapter 6. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 195. 195
Thus, the solar magnetic activity possibly affects the climate through
interacting with AO (or NAO). Such a suggestion seems worth to note.
[Kiminori Itoh]
6-1560 A 37:19 Replace with Eastern African hydrological variability Accepted. Text modified.
[Vincent Gray]
6-1561 A 37:22 37:22 Remove extra brackets around references.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert Review Comments on First-Order Draft, Chapter 9. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 136. 136
This paper looks so important that
its negligence will be not justified.
[Kiminori Itoh]
9-1054 A 49:55 50:3 Is global climate change being left off as a possible factor simply because a linear change Rewritten to indicate that these
is not seen?