Skip to search form

RESULTS: 41 - 50 of 3914

 

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert Review Comments on First-Order Draft, Chapter 2. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 364. 364

American Journal of Botany, 90, pp 610-619 (2003), Wagner F et al. Science vol. 284 p 92 (1999)).) [Richard S Courtney] 2-6 A 3:45 3:45 "To avoid being very misleading it is necessary to make an insertion between “… TAR.” Do not agree with their asessmment or Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote Chapter 2: Batch AB (11/16/05) Page 364 of 386

 

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert Review Comments on First-Order Draft, Chapter 2. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 367. 367

And no objective or scientific in nature estimate provided by computer models of the climate system has any value of any kind when “the scientific understanding is low” because the models are merely formulations of understandings of the climate system. [Richard S Courtney] 2-13 A 5:19 5:19 Replace the phrase “Observations and models indicate that” with “Observations indicate Do not agree with their asesssment.

 

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert Review Comments on First-Order Draft, Chapter 2. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 385. 385

International Journal of Climatology, vol. 23, 829-845 (2003)) [Richard S Courtney] 2-65 A 47:33 47:34 "Replace the sentence, “This unexpectedly large impact … Shine, 2005)” with Minnis’ emperical mode is likely “Two climate model studies have failed to emulate this unexpectedly large impact wrong.

 

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert and Government Review Comments on the Second-Order Draft, Summary for Policymakers Comments w/ Responses. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 53. 53

[2.3]” [Richard Courtney (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 49-7)] SPM- A 5:7 5:7 Insert before "increases"" If water vapour and clouds are ignored completely" Water vapor and cloud changes are feedback effects 329 [VINCENT GRAY (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 88-2154)] and dealt with below.

 

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert Review Comments on First-Order Draft, Chapter 2. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 386. 386

However, I became so angry at the need to point out the above elementary principles that I abandoned the review at this point: the draft should be withdrawn and replaced by another that displays an adequate level of scientific competence). [Richard S Courtney] Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote Chapter 2: Batch AB (11/16/05) Page 386 of 386

 

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert and Government Review Expert and Government Review Comments on the Second-Order Draft, Technical Summary Comments. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 32. 32

However, it cannot be excluded that the production rate from other sources, such as microbiological activity, among others, could have increased. ” [Richard Courtney (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 49-58)] TS-167 A 7:8 7:8 This Table makes iit impossible to detect trends.

 

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert and Government Review Comments on the Second-Order Draft, Summary for Policymakers Comments w/ Responses. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 162. 162

Indeed, additional complexity may reduce the accuracy of a model because it may exacerbate the effects of an erroneous parametrisation. [Richard Courtney (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 49-29)] SPM- A 12:1 12:3 provide more substantive information in this highlightes /bold letter sentence Accepted 1066 [Govt. of Germany (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 2011-237)] SPM- A 12:1 12:1 add information on expected warming for mitigation scenarios, in particular very WG1 has no basis to evaulate which scenarios are 1067 9 low stabilisation scenarios.