RESULTS: 41 - 50 of 3914
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert Review Comments on First-Order Draft, Chapter 2. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 364. 364
American Journal of Botany, 90, pp
610-619 (2003), Wagner F et al. Science vol. 284 p 92 (1999)).)
[Richard S Courtney]
2-6 A 3:45 3:45 "To avoid being very misleading it is necessary to make an insertion between
TAR. Do not agree with their asessmment or
Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote Chapter 2: Batch AB (11/16/05) Page 364 of 386
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert Review Comments on First-Order Draft, Chapter 2. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 367. 367
And no objective or scientific in nature
estimate provided by computer models of the climate system has any value of any kind
when the scientific understanding is low because the models are merely formulations of
understandings of the climate system.
[Richard S Courtney]
2-13 A 5:19 5:19 Replace the phrase Observations and models indicate that with Observations indicate Do not agree with their asesssment.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert Review Comments on First-Order Draft, Chapter 2. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 385. 385
International Journal of Climatology, vol. 23,
829-845 (2003))
[Richard S Courtney]
2-65 A 47:33 47:34 "Replace the sentence, This unexpectedly large impact
Shine, 2005) with Minnis emperical mode is likely
Two climate model studies have failed to emulate this unexpectedly large impact wrong.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert and Government Review Expert and Government Review Comments on the Second-Order Draft, Technical Summary Comments. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 17. 17
However,
it cannot be excluded that the production rate from other sources, such as microbiological
activity, among others, could have increased.
[Richard Courtney (Reviewers comment ID #: 49-47)]
TS-107 A 5:52 5:52 Do you need to say "small portion"?
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert and Government Review Comments on the Second-Order Draft, Summary for Policymakers Comments w/ Responses. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 53. 53
[2.3]
[Richard Courtney (Reviewers comment ID #: 49-7)]
SPM- A 5:7 5:7 Insert before "increases"" If water vapour and clouds are ignored completely" Water vapor and cloud changes are feedback effects
329 [VINCENT GRAY (Reviewers comment ID #: 88-2154)] and dealt with below.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert Review Comments on First-Order Draft, Chapter 2. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 386. 386
However, I became so angry at the need to point out the above
elementary principles that I abandoned the review at this point: the draft should be
withdrawn and replaced by another that displays an adequate level of scientific
competence).
[Richard S Courtney]
Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote Chapter 2: Batch AB (11/16/05) Page 386 of 386
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert and Government Review Expert and Government Review Comments on the Second-Order Draft, Technical Summary Comments. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 32. 32
However,
it cannot be excluded that the production rate from other sources, such as microbiological
activity, among others, could have increased.
[Richard Courtney (Reviewers comment ID #: 49-58)]
TS-167 A 7:8 7:8 This Table makes iit impossible to detect trends.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert and Government Review Comments on the Second-Order Draft, Summary for Policymakers Comments w/ Responses. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 197. 197
[Govt. of France (Reviewers comment ID #: 2010-115)]
SPM- A 14:2 14:2 "This section seems a conclusion and would be helpful for policy makers to draw The section is not a conclusion - SPMs do not have
1309 2 3 a quick inference.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert and Government Review Expert and Government Review Comments on the Second-Order Draft, Technical Summary Comments. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 24. 24
.
[Richard Courtney (Reviewers comment ID #: 49-51)]
TS-140 A 6:31 6:31 Change the opening to singular--there is only one atmospheric CO2 concentration (at least Accepted
on a global average).
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert and Government Review Comments on the Second-Order Draft, Summary for Policymakers Comments w/ Responses. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 162. 162
Indeed, additional complexity may reduce the accuracy of
a model because it may exacerbate the effects of an erroneous parametrisation.
[Richard Courtney (Reviewers comment ID #: 49-29)]
SPM- A 12:1 12:3 provide more substantive information in this highlightes /bold letter sentence Accepted
1066
[Govt. of Germany (Reviewers comment ID #: 2011-237)]
SPM- A 12:1 12:1 add information on expected warming for mitigation scenarios, in particular very WG1 has no basis to evaulate which scenarios are
1067 9 low stabilisation scenarios.