Skip to search form

RESULTS: 31 - 40 of 3914

 

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert and Government Review Expert and Government Review Comments on the Second-Order Draft, Technical Summary Comments. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 34. 34

[Richard Courtney (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 49-61)] TS-186 A 7:39 7:39 For clarity, consider adding "atmospheric" before "CO2 on terrestrial …" Agreed [Melinda Marquis (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 162-105)] TS-187 A 7:39 7:44 This paragraph uderstates current knowledge.

 

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert and Government Review Expert and Government Review Comments on the Second-Order Draft, Technical Summary Comments. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 7. 7

Text edited [Richard Soulen (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 248-19)] TS-37 A 3:8 Replace "over-arching themes" with "evident" and replace "the" with "this" Agreed [Richard Soulen (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 248-20)] TS-38 A 3:10 3:10 It would be helpful to have a second paragraph at line 10 which discusses what is known Text of first paragraph deals with this in about climate and climate change.

 
 

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert Review Comments on First-Order Draft, Chapter 2. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 365. 365

The authors of this chapter seem to be ignorant of the warming effect of sulphate aerosols combined with soot particles. [Richard S Courtney] 2-8 A 4:2 4:2 Page 2-4 Chapter 2 Line 2 of the draft says nitrous oxide is the “fourth most important Text will be changed.

 

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert Review Comments on First-Order Draft, Chapter 2. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 374. 374

Batch From To Comment Notes al. 2005) (ref. Rorsch A, Thoenes D and Courtney RS, (E&E v10 no2 (2005)). [Richard S Courtney] 2-30 A 10:15 10:18 Delete everything from “the combustion of cement production …” to “… biomass Rejected.

 

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert Review Comments on First-Order Draft, Chapter 1. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 116. 116

[Richard S Courtney] 1-3 A 2:23 2:23 Replace “today’s comprehensive models of the climate system” with “today’s models of Accepted. the climate system” because no comprehensive model of the climate system has been developed to date (e.g.

 

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert and Government Review Expert and Government Review Comments on the Second-Order Draft, Technical Summary Comments. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 15. 15

However, it cannot be excluded that the production rate from other sources, such as microbiological activity, among others, could have increased. ” [Richard Courtney (Reviewer’s comment ID #: 49-45)] TS-96 A 5:47 5:50 Make explicit that the long-lived gases are well mixed in the atmosphere and therefore Accepted.

 

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Papers; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Papers: Working Group I, The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, 2005-2007; Expert Review Comments on First-Order Draft, Chapter 2. ESPP IPCCAR4WG1. Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives. Harvard College Library, Cambridge, Mass. page 371. 371

It is an important and significant advance if the IPCC is - at last - starting to consider climate mechanisms that are more significant to climate change than radiative forcing. [Richard S Courtney] 2-25 A 8:41 8:41 To avoid being completely misleading and to be factually correct, at the start of Section Agree to some rewording.